kicker.None of these plays were accounted for in his NFL passer ratin

10 Consecutive Tests lost by Pakistan in Australia - the most by any team away. The record was previously held by two teams: India from 1948 to 1977 and West Indies from 2000 to 2009 - also in Australia.308 Difference in Pakistans totals in this match - 142 in first innings and 450 in the second. It is their third highest in a Test. Their highest difference was in Bridgetown in 1957-58, when they made 657 for 8 in the second innings after being bundled out for 106 in the first.2 Number of bigger fourth-innings totals in Tests than Pakistans 450 in this match. The highest is Englands 654 for 5 in the timeless Test in Durban in 1938-39. Pakistans previous highest was 382 for 3 against Sri Lanka in Pallekele last year, when they chased down 377.39 Margin of defeat for Pakistan - the second lowest for a team after making more than 400 while chasing. The lowest is New Zealands 38-run defeat after they made 440 at Trent Bridge in 1973. Overall, this is Pakistans fifth narrowest defeat while chasing. Pakistans 450 is the joint third-highest total when chasing in Tests1988 The last time Australia lost a Test at the Gabba, against West Indies. Since then in 28 Tests, they have won 22 and drawn six.230 Runs added by Pakistans last four wickets - the most for any team while chasing. The previous highest was 227 by India at Lords in 2002. Pakistan had three fifty-plus partnerships in those four wickets, which is the first such instance for a chasing team. It was also the first time Pakistan had three fifty-plus stands among their last four wickets in any match.113 The previous top score by an individual in the fourth innings at the Gabba, Sunil Gavaskar in 1977-78 and Sherwin Campbell in 1996-97. Asad Shafiq bettered that with his 137 in this match.2 Higher scores for a player batting at No. 6 or lower while chasing than Shafiqs 137. Adam Gilchrist made unbeaten 149 at No. 7 against Pakistan in Hobart in 1999-00 and Daniel Vettori 140 at No. 8 in Colombo (SSC) in 2009. Adam Thielen Jersey . The 17-year-old native of Marystown, N.L., pulled out of Skate Canada International last month in Saint John, N.B., with the same problem. Chris Doleman Womens Jersey . Despite the cost, effort and an improved steroid test, its possible that very few -- if any -- positives will be detected, Dr. Richard Budgett told The Associated Press in an interview. "We just dont know what the results from Torino will be," Budgett said. http://www.thevikingsshoponline.com/Youth-alexander-mattison-vikings-jersey/ . Nigeria beat surprise package Ethiopia 2-0 in the second leg of their playoff for a comfortable 4-1 aggregate victory. Victor Moses converted a 20th-minute penalty after an Ethiopian handball, and Victor Obinna made certain of Nigerias place in Brazil with his powerful free kick in the 82nd at UJ Esuene Stadium. Irv Smith Jr. Vikings Jersey . Bryant, who signed a five-year, $34 million contract as a free agent with Cleveland in March, reported symptoms on Monday morning, a team spokesman said. Fran Tarkenton Youth Jersey . Aaron Harrison scored a 22 points for Kentucky (6-1), which has won four in a row following a Nov. 12 loss to current No. 1 Michigan State. Julius Randle overcame a scoreless first half and added his sixth double-double in as many games with 14 points and 10 rebounds. Often in this space well explore the work of someone who had an exceptionally poor performance QBR-wise, or look at why an opponent adjustment may be helping or hurting a QBs numbers. So why are we looking this week at Detroit Lions QB Matthew Stafford, who had an above-average opponent-adjusted QBR of 66.1 in Sundays win over the Eagles? The reason is that Stafford also happened to possess the highest NFL passer rating of the week at 135.0. Lets take a look at what differentiates Total QBR from Staffords traditional passer rating:Dont forget about the fumbleStaffords passing numbers (19 of 25, 180 yards, 3 TD) last week were fairly impressive. He completed 76 percent of his attempts and threw for three scores without an interception -- all good things. But one area the NFL passer rating fails to account for is when a QB fumbles, yet fumbles are often a big part of the picture of a quarterbacks day.Stafford was responsible for only one turnover, a fumble lost, but it was a potentially costly one. With the Lions up by four and operating at their own 12-yard-line midway through the third quarter, Stafford lost control of the ball while trying to maneuver within the pocket. Officially, the play is recorded as a sack, and the fumble was recovered by the Eagles at the 16, setting them up with a chance to pull within a point with a field goal or take the lead. To put it in terms of their win probability, Detroit went from a 62 percent chance to win before the play to a 50 percent chance after -- a loss of 12 percentage points.Staffords QBR fell from 90.5 to 81.0 on the play though his NFL passer rating was unchanged, underscoring the incomplete nature of the latter metric.Sacks matter tooIn addition to the aforementioned sack-and-fumble, Stafford took three other sacks.dddddddddddd The first came on the play just before the lost fumble. That, along with a damaging unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Anquan Boldin, is what helped set the Lions back to their own 12.Staffords other two sacks both came on third downs in the fourth quarter. The first turned a third-and-7 at the Eagles 38 (on the verge of field goal range) into a fourth-and-16 and a punt, dropping his QBR from a 76.5 before the play to a 67.5 afterward. His final sack came on a third-and-goal from the Eagles 5. Not nearly as detrimental as the lost fumble or moving out of field goal range, but it also wasnt a positive and did make the ensuing field goal attempt slightly more difficult for his kicker.None of these plays were accounted for in his NFL passer rating.How penalties improved Staffords numbersPenalties are one area NFL passer rating overlooks and QBR accounts for, and in this case it was actually beneficial to the latter number for Stafford. He was able to draw a defensive offsides call and a pair of defensive pass interference flags, and while none were huge gains for him, QBR does account for these plays.In the end, the largest differentiators between Staffords QBR and his passer rating were the four sacks and the turnover. If we look at just his 25 passing attempts, his raw QBR would have been an 81. But losses incurred from those damaging plays get us to his final number of 66.1, highlighting the magnitude negative plays can have on a game.A look at Staffords week-to-week progression in the QBR realm: ' ' '